Building Smarter Testbenches: My Game-Changer with AHB Reactive Slave Agent
While working on an advanced AMBA AHB verification environment, I ran into a classic challenge - maintaining accurate, real-time slave responses during back-to-back transactions.
Initially, I relied on a static slave model. It worked for basic checks, but things broke down fast when burst sequences, wait states, and split transactions came into play.
That’s when I discovered the power of a Reactive Slave Agent
This approach ensures accurate protocol compliance and reflects how real hardware behaves in modern SoC systems.
By making the agent truly reactive, I was able to:
But the biggest win?
Smarter debugging & cleaner architecture - I could separate test intent (in the sequence) from protocol logic (in the agent), making root-cause analysis way faster.
Final Thoughts:
If you're developing a UVM-based AHB testbench, consider making your slave agent reactive. It brings you closer to silicon-accurate simulations, and scales effortlessly with complex designs.
Let me know your thoughts or if you'd like to see a snippet of how I implemented it
Have you worked with reactive agents before?
If you need a PPT on this topic, feel free to ping us! We'd be happy to assist.
vishnu vaishnav | Sukhveer R. | Vadher Chirag | Harsh Bhut | Harsh Patel |Kaushal Narodiya | Janak Dharaiya | Anand Dodiya | Indeeksha Digital Pvt. Ltd. | IndEeksha Innovative Semiforce (ActivEdge)